|
Attorney Tomer Ezrahi |
| |
Education:
Areas of Practice:
-
Any and all kinds of commercial and civil litigation
-
Litigation in many and varied areas, such as business disputes, planning and construction, eviction lawsuits, financial claims, administrative petitions, claims for money damages, dissolution of partnerships, real estate related litigation, betterment levies, development levies, administrative petitions and petition to the High Court of Justice (interlocutory writs and orders), especially in the areas of bids, neighbors disputes, etc.
-
Handling and petitioning for preventive injunctions and other interlocutory remedies
-
A significant participant (while working at another law office) in securing a important decision from the Israeli Supreme Court in Offir Spigel v. Environmental Services Company, Ltd., Case No. 9562/10, where it was held that a business competitor, or anyone related to a business competitor, who seeks information from a counterpart, by filing a petition based on the provisions of the Freedom of Information Act, must reveal his personal interest in the information sought, and a failure to do so may cause the petition to be denied, solely due to the failure to make such disclosure.
-
A significant participant (while working at another law office) in securing a precedential decision handed down by the Tel Aviv District Court in a criminal Appeal case (The Municipality of Tel Aviv v. Ilana Levengrov, AFA 25889-06-11), where it was decided that when there is an approved plea agreement, granting the defendant time to secure a building permit before a judicial demolition order had gone into effect, there is no need to issue an administrative demotion order and one that was issued has to be revoked.
-
A significant participant (while working at another law office) in securing a precedential decision, handed down by the Tel Aviv District Court in an appeal from an administrative decision (Estate of Amir v. Local Committee for Planning and Construction, Ramat Gan, et al, ATM 2299/09), where it was determined that, in exceptional cases where property rights in land, granted during a re-division according to the provisions of § 122 of the Planning and Construction Act (1965), are insignificant, the owner may be limited to monetary compensation without being entitled to any rights in the real property itself. |
|
|
|
|